Good. It's called "attrition"
...top, or at least most prolific contributor? I'm going w/@Zoie
I am here occasionally.
There there, I suck too; it'll be alright. C'mon now, where would the alphas be without the haunting goad of our non-presence driving them like hounds all the way to the grave?
I just said that I am here occasionally... ;D
MOI! BUT NOBODY READS MY POSTS OR GIVES A SHIT!
"Pity party, table for one." C'mon Dave, that use of "nobody" is somthing that females do. Besides, your drive by blanket bigotry, "bussin' caps" combined with the nigh savantish spewing of slurs... ....kinda hard to miss, and that's the point isn't it? I've tried to engage multiple times with minimal to nul apparent effect. So, again, how you doin'? Oh to be fair to you, I'd put you more in the running for top commentator. @Zoie, as I rate, is the champ at questions/kicking things off, inducing diabetic coma with her "Shock and 'Awwwww'" etc You could try, as has been asked, to substatiate your claims, offer studies etc. In other words, be active, which is what contributors do, as opposed to reactive, which is what frothers and trolls do, or responsive, which is what those returning measured, considered, thoughtful content do.